Lecture 19 yuan yi figure, LeiSiJi's "painting"

Qixian LeiSiJi (1231 a 1302), the word, fuzhou linchuan (now jiangxi province) people.Song wu abandon theconfucian suit for the road, in the view of wushi, car-marthenshire cloud shu, explore the metaphysics.Old age should be tianshi Taoism thirty-six generation for metaphysics lecturer, sermons Yu Guangxin mountains, Mr Scholars regarded as empty mountain.Figure tong yi works in "change" five volumes, "yi divinatory tong bian;" three volumes.

The figure is easy in dade boxer (1300).Frontispiece column "figure of painting 40) mistakenly" (see below), and the towering figure of both lean on a few ", "wu refs to become number of complex figure" and "will get general layout and two complex", etc.Redwood the Lord said "painting" for four decades, yue: "painting book and four dimensional forty, round cloth for the body, with five to ten days with, with its, so count fifty five or heaven and earth."Refers to the four dozen "painting" of fuxi, holy into the paintings of the hexagrams.Redwood to several matched with sticks and jiugong number eight in the virtual palace with said hexagrams bagua azimuth: days with candy, eight with gen, day three earthquakes, four match xun, a dish from, seven match against the second match he, day, and the six dry.

LeiSiJi "painting"

Its "painting" refers to see Chen tuan, author, by ways of tangible jiugong "image" and 55 "shu" two figure, derived to Liu Muzong 55 figure, and li Gou "yuan could this three copies of a, error analysis thought three".Yue: "to the person, the number of figure in 55 painting means is false, and to the south of preaching against who suggests.Stop by the reverse fan, on Monday.Liu Mu, and li Gou with "hung fan" nine domain of number is "shu", "cover the jump", zhu xi, and Cai Yuanding "book to figure, to as enters, and an ignorant and presumptuous person of an ignorant and presumptuous person".Reye's main "shu" is painting points figure, yue: "yu, call plan several can pass, and it has book domain classes to count, and do not think figure of cloth and."

In fact, four dozen redwood figure of black and white points with gossip, is inductive liu xinying, an ' 'painting "is the gossip with Liu Mu black and white point number nine" painting "and for" tai chi "in zhu xu said, to deduce the figure out is" painting "the history of a newer figure.With so-called "before the figure of xihe river, both is and drawing Numbers, and in the book of los yu, complex, and Syria domain" of "than class and mutual too" said the interpretation of the "copulative", "river of figure, a book, saints", nearly is seemed at the time, but today to "yi" is not a consensus for Confucius to points qi, no matter how to explain is meaningless.This is a sign of the feudal society by the words "st" literati deviate helpless state of mind.Redwood neither think "copulative" this saying is "saint to Shinto set teaching", and not the main Liu Mu number nine "painting", zhu xi's ten "painting") and if you still want to explain "copulative" "river figure, a book, SAN into the", and only said these, so as to deduce a new and a new one way.

"Easy figure tong bian" of "painting distinguishes the sign" for the easy graphics history raises an important question: "three" - by Chen tuan the book?

, "says the redwood figure south for three, though the" three Chen nine of the hexagrams purport to Confucius, but its sequence yue 'by ways of days as shown, xihe, of combined with Kong Mo and shape, and Ming said' the beginning of the figure is not close, but a number of 55 ', is called "the biography of great and 25 days, and the number thirty in all."Thus, redwood can see book by orderly and the body.Chen and the "three nine hexagrams" cloud for the text in the text, scattered and shown the "day" cloud on the sequence in the text.Like that and this can be found in chap ", in the preface to three aspects of "the three master Chen, explore its purport, nine meanings so know" of the text.《道藏曋芤淄肌酚小冻率先戮咆酝肌分迹妓?“希夷曰：龙图，天散而示之，伏羲合而用之，仲尼默而形之。三陈九卦探其旨，所以知之也。故履德之基明用十，谦德之柄明用十五(亦明五用在干谦)，复德之本明用二十四也。故三卦属上经，明干之用统于坤，六卦属下经，明坤之用兼于干也。斯则天三三地二二之义耳。”比较之后可知，《周易图》所引似为当时《龙图》一书本文，而雷氏所见又有所不同，至于张理则仅一序言而已。虽三人所见者皆有“三陈九卦”与“天散而示之”之文，却分属三种不同的书中。个中的问题的确需要辨析。

雷思齐之前的冯椅于《厚斋易学晔热逯觥分屑?“《中兴书目》‘易龙图一卷’，本朝处士陈抟撰。”冯椅之前，朱熹尝曰：“龙图是假书，无所用。”(《朱子语类》卷六十七)朱熹之友吕祖谦取当时内府及士大夫所藏诸家文集凡八百家，编《皇朝文鉴》(明代改称《宋文鉴》)内收《易龙图序》(即张理所引之文)，而朱、吕之前，郑樵于《通志昙瘴穆浴肪嘁淄疾考恰傲家痪怼?无作者之名，于《通志曂计茁浴贰凹怯小敝屑恰傲肌薄ⅰ俺孪R囊淄肌?其“龙图”之记仍无作者之名。可知，既然“记有”，则郑樵当时见有此《龙图》一卷之书和一幅“龙图”，如果真为陈抟之书之图，郑樵不会故意隐去其姓名。

Chen tuan "Zhou Yitu" cite "five", "ten", "24", aims to expound the virtue of "three nine hexagrams" Chen, and not to say that the saint "by" draw diagrams.To LeiSiJi can see, the body is "jiugong" and "shu" figure 2, figure of the "three" as the number nine, to the chap is only scattered and shown the "day" as penetration bead on the number of 55, said its "three" and the number nine.Now that "three" false book, for in accordance with the Liu Mu LeiSiJi see said, and chap can see when out for according to zhu xi said.Hu Wei at the beginning of the qing dynasty of the easy figure right from this cause is very bright, guide the yuan dynasty Liu Yin said: "by ways of the said not necessarily Liu Mu before Lv Bogong to mistakenly, Jude Zhang Jingfu deceives by wearing division more also.Lay not WenYouShu, this view its sequence of the absurd, is beyond description.Did not match the number of thought out three nine of the hexagrams purport and Chen, Chen's three nine sticks in the painting of any interference?The quasi no matter, very funny."Again yue: "if by this, st into may not like, so the day will be scattered and in first.With the wise sage, it in day to the saints do not see the point?And make the TRW and SAN into the fruit can't see the point, when the bulk can also was a saint and combined with the evil?"Again lead huang said: "the preface to three in the Song Wenjian, painting for ten.Neo-confucianist Liu Mu for painting of the nine, don't take this for license, with its false book also.Sequence as said, solid can't there is no doubt that refers to figure river out not close, fu xi and use of, is fuxi painted hexagrams and drawing too."

We learn from the book of the so-called "three aspects" or sequence evolution before and after to see, is "easy to hook function diagram" under "by one of the nine" language and pseudo into the book of "three" and the figure (at that time, but not of Chen tuan, so the characteristics "with" does not belong to the author), to zhu xi "three as one of the fake book" language and pseudo into "Yi Longtu sequence" (Lv Zuqian deceives by scholar-bureaucrat at that time, false to ten painting out of the ancient record of).To LeiSiJi is not to discern the false Chen tuan, Liu Mu, non li Gou;To the chap is also not to discern the false pleaded that zhu xi's "painting", "shu".There is a right and wrong, there is a right and wrong, at the end of the day, all of the black and white dot hilo-systems figure is not really easy to figure.And in easy figure we learn history with large section of the text narrative of these is not really easy to figure figure, it is because that figure heavily in the yi-ology works of past dynasties, have to say it.LeiSiJi investing Liu Mu as "an ignorant and presumptuous person", zhu xi, and CAI yuan as an ignorant and presumptuous person "of" an ignorant and presumptuous person, actually fundamentally denied from period to dynasty "hilo-systems said".Self-reliance said the purpose is to prove that, if you want to use for black and white points ", river out of the figure, a book, saints ", is not only Liu Mu, zhu xi's two answers, and the third answer is there.In particular, he "" shu" cannot draw the figure of points for the claim, is more bright.If we pay attention to the large amount of words about the "traditional" dialectical is attack has sung generation "hilo-systems says" good article.A Taoist person have this as a rare.