Without a leader who headed?

Qian zhou hexagram "five-year", all previous dynasties usually interpreted it as a emperor, is a gentleman.Hexagram men step up, then, becomes a "KangLongYou regrets", it seems to have been the end of day, emperor on "KangLongYou regrets", and come out a "nine" out of thin air, tell people to "leaderless, auspicious", it seems really what is the hidden meaning in it.

The hidden meaning, foreign experts have studied the edge?

This study begins with a question of world war ii, the focus is on the rogue and Nazi GermanykillMake the group set up the regime.Once the regime near the monarchy, and forces the heyday, in the words of the zhouyi is is in the originality of the ninth hexagram "dragon in the day" the statue of five-year "seat.But this seat around the guy and his partners, is all some greatly small bad egg, so, the question is: the center of the bad guys to climb to the highest power, it's a chance in the history of totalitarianism in coincidence, or the inevitable result of the totalitarian develop?That is to say, if the original is some decent people to be the tallest leadership, also under the totalitarian system, does not bring social great Gospel?

This is an intriguing problem, we think, in the history of the Chinese emperor qianlong era, if not more than two thousand years of China's golden age, at least one of a handful of the heyday of several times, but this is an era of autocratic imperial power, and is also an era's notoriously corrupt - don't forget the declaration first worthies, but this time he probably is one of the largest in the history of Chinese corrupt officials.

Very strange, super time incredibly and super corruption coexist?!

Maybe your explanation is: "this is a good, thanks to the emperor qianlong was undeterred monarch."Pretty good, in the authoritarian system, dictator is an excellent man, homo habilis, folks who can't think what could be more than that deserves to be ecstatic.Again, this is Chinese intellectuals generally only dream of.

So, from the intellectuals to ordinary people, everyone call Lord's dictatorship.

But the Lord's dictatorship, the question is when the dictator is the emperor qianlong, prosperous on the whole, corrupt officials also greedy, everyone satisfied, but you would be very under a dictator must have won't be emperor yangdi.- ancient intellectuals nerve-racking to this question, so often there will be a pundit, advised the emperor "are our hearts", that is to say, hope the dictator through self-discipline, by accepting the Confucian moral principles, to be a holy Lord, a good emperor.

- you know, I am a great guy, and I also read a lot of Confucian classics, so, sometimes I ask myself on this issue: if I see a big wallet lying on the ground, punctuated with hundreds of dollars, and I also know that when I put this thousand dollars in his pocket after is not subject to any punishment, so, I will do so?

The heart after a fierce battle between heaven and man, finally conscience got the upper hand, I finally put the big wallet to the police's uncle.

But, if not thousands in the wallet, but one million?

It's a deadly problem!Review the dao, I had to think about what ritual righteousness, propriety.However, this is a, a, one million!Although the word said to police's uncle is glorious, pocket a disgrace, but, no matter what I did, nobody can anyone sanctions got me!That, that, that...And a fierce fighting between heaven and man, conscience has the upper hand, flow tears in her eyes I finally with a pair of trembling hands to give big purse to the police's uncle.

However, if the wallet is not one million, but ten million?

.........I finally betrayed their own conscience!

See, I was able to "are our hearts", but if you give me unlimited power, I don't have a bit of confidence that he will not run amok.If I was the emperor, once the "sincerity" is heart didn't hold, a large people have to follow the bad luck.

But then the problem is: I admit I can't do that, but I already was a good man, and read up on Confucian classics, so, if I am a master of Confucian classics brick can't do, others can do it?

Or, even if in the beginning, also a long time can also do it?

- in history is full of answer to this question.So, back to our zhouyi, if from the point of view of the monarchy, the originality of cha ages developed to the "dragon after day" will inevitably is "KangLongYou regrets".

Foreign experts explanation is that although the absolute effect will be as the supreme ruler is good or bad and have bigger difference, but "we have a lot of reason to believe that, in our opinion seems to be constitutes the totalitarian system of existing the worst features of those things, is not accidental by-products, but sooner or later, will produce the phenomenon of" totalitarianism.This also means that, although the Lord dictatorship will create a prosperous situation, but the authoritarian system in the field of power can be said to be a good money after bad, bad guys out the perpetual motion machine a good man, is a bad egg and shameless mean person speculation in the heaven.

Some might not, after all, and a lot of people are obsessed with HanWu emperor kangxi emperor era, this are great autocratic empire, tai temple is impending, landscape is also an unprecedented large.

The mood is not the patent of Chinese, and a great George Bernard shaw once advocated: "destined to belong to a powerful country in the world, small must be incorporated into of, otherwise, they must be destroyed."

- if "powerful nation" is led by the Lord's monarch, speakers at least at first glance is not bad as what the unforgivable.

Yes, the greatest sage, a nationwide biggest benefactor, would do a bad thing?

- he will only do good not only, also very will teach people good reason.In general, the Lord who in addition to the political supremacy, as well as the great teacher of all citizens, he will get his force recognizes the moral standards of all people, think people need to learn to be an official imperial rule, in order to pass the necessaryThe test.As a result, under the holy Lord who formed an ideological uniformity (at least looks like a uniform) rule group.

Foreign experts said: "such a large, powerful and quite a like-minded group, seems to be in any society is impossible by one of the best, but only by the worst molecules to build, there are three main reasons for this."

The first reason is: "generally speaking, the higher education and the knowledge of each person, their views and interest, the less the same..."It is easy to understand, for example, we put forward a topic:" in the best interest of the most people in the system is good."Given to ten illiteracy to discuss this issue, the most likely outcome is that ten hands consistent approval.But what if the same this issue to ten a philosopher or a sociologist discussion, at least ten people have seven kinds of opinions.

Again, for example, the second issue: "shi lang is a national hero?"If to ten has no interest in the history of bureaucracy to discuss, the answer is likely or consistent: "love is never heard of the man."But if to intellectual discussion of ten have independent thought, the results may have to fight.

The second reason is that: the society and the lack of many independent thinking ability and ability, they are very lazy to think, as long as jabbering loudly, to what they preach a, they would accept easily.

The third reason is: create a powerful enemy image, which helps to unity and absorb more "our own".- because we are threatened by a powerful enemy, so must closely together.So a clever dictator is very good at making enemies.

Well, so the result of what is it?

Foreign experts then said: if the society or country is more important than personal, so, this will lead to only those who are common goal to struggle for the society can be considered as members of the society, furthermore, the existence of the personal meaning is the only being with a group of molecules, rather than individual character."Once upon a time a lot of people into independently exercise their power concentrated in the hands of a single group, can make the power expansion to unprecedented levels, its influence is extremely widespread, almost made it into another thing."

We still see a directly below the original the better:

Advancement within a totalitarian group or party depends largely on a willingness to do immoral things. The principle that the end justifies the means， which in individualist ethics is regarded as the denial of all morals， in collectivist ethics becomes necessarily the supreme rule. There is literally nothing which the consistent collectivist must not be prepared to do if it serves ‘the good of the whole’， because that is to him the only criterion of what ought to be done. Once you admit that the individual is merely a means to serve the ends of the higher entity called society or the nation， most of those features of totalitarianism which horrify us follow of necessity.

From the collectivist standpoint intolerance and brutal suppression of dissent， deception and spying， the complete disregard of the life and happiness of the individual are essential and unavoidable. Acts which revolt all our feelings， such as the shooting of hostages or the killing of the old or sick， are treated as mere matters of expediency; the compulsory uprooting and transportation of hundreds of thousands becomes an instrument of policy approved by almost everybody except the victims.

To be a useful assistant in the running of a totalitarian state， therefore， a man must be prepared to break every moral rule he has ever known if this seems necessary to achieve the end set for him. In the totalitarian machine there will be special opportunities for the ruthless and unscrupulous. Neither the Gestapo nor the administration of a concentration camp， neither the Ministry of Propaganda nor the SA or SS (or their Russian counterparts) are suitable places for the exercise of humanitarian feelings. Yet it is through such positions that the road to the highest positions in the totalitarian state leads.

A distinguished American economist， Professor Frank H.Knight， correctly notes that the authorities of a collectivist state ‘would have to do these things whether they wanted to or not： and the probability of the people in power being individuals who would dislike the possession and exercise of power is on a level with the probability that an extremely tender-hearted person would get the job of whipping master in a slave plantation’.

Finally, we review, if you don't talk to abandon the hereditary power, so, frank knight is indeed worthy of serious experience: "if a person is not much desire for power, so, if this person could even in power, your bag and precious little weak can take refuge in a swing to the slave owners hands do the whip strict supervisor."

- don't tell me you don't know package cherish who is weak?She is the mother of yang2 kang!

Don't tell me you also did not think of the foreign experts who is it?He is hayek.

Consider his mountain is necessary.Ok, we look back the zhouyi, from "dragon in the day" to "KangLongYou regrets", to "decapitated", is there some new experience?

"Decapitated" being held to the highest position, isn't it implied the reaction of "dragon in the day"?

Someone may be a pie mouth: "feeling to feel, but also can't realization too wide of the mark?People can have more than two thousand years ago this avant-garde ideas?"

Ah, this is not impossible.

I said so, of course, there is a basis.This basis aside, please appreciate the first two poems:

Big fast people worry, find out the gang of four.

Political hooligans literary prostitute, head strategist.

And refined raw bones, since the day after wu, iron broom.

Purge, pillow pipe dream.

Great ambition, plot to poison, trick.

Red sun was a sin to say this plainly, persecution.

Successor is junjie, legacy inherited decisive, achievement He Huihuang.

Support China chairman, advocacy of the CPC central committee.

-- -- "to crush the gang of four"

Come again a new poetry:

The topic of chairman MAO in photography work in a plane

At an altitude of ten thousand meters,

In the figure above - 104 aircraft,

It is no wonder that is doubly bright sunshine,

Machines and closed to have two SUNS!

The tireless spirit, noble thought,

The symphony of cemented movement,

Like a serene unforgiving mountains,

Also like the boundless expanse of the sea!

These two poems, and need a lot of people will feel familiar.Well, this is written by guo moruo.It is very disgusting?It's disgusting, right?But please don't try to hard, calm down and listen to me, the last two sentences.

Guo moruo's contemporary historiography everybody's work, I also read some more or less, there is a feeling, no solid, solid enough;But no intelligent, I'm afraid Guo Lao near the top.

Guo Lao book, not only the strong point of view, knowledge, and all through the that son smart, he is old and discrepancy between literature and history, into the history of the gift pen, often to read, often let I admire to.Later I was strange, so a person, how can write the above poem?All say he flatters no conduct, shameless, scholars who see who said these bad poetry nausea, but, really like you said?

How do I want to how to feel not to Guo Lao intellect, if serious to write eulogistic poetry, can write enough level, can people feel comfortable and let to be written, and let us not feel nothing.So I think, his old man's house this is likely to be intentional.

Just look at the "to", content, level and oblique tones don't pay attention to, the law, it is the basic skill in writing poems to write lyrics, Guo Lao this skill which can go wrong?, when chairman MAO had written Guo Lao mistake no such poems, neat enough, want to come because the chairman himself master of poetry, not easy to deceive.

It remind me of my previous writing experience.- well, it may be some people think I don't how to write a book, it may, for writing this sort of thing is not my strengths, my strength is to write checks.

Remember school is speak of the land on the "representative" : you not yourself Xiong Yi oh, you represent your class at school, the school you on behalf of the school, and so on.(you can contact the above in hayek those views.)

When I am bad, you are required to write a check, defy spirit in my heart, but no power of resistance, so, since to write check to apologize, I am "hard" to recognize!This check I have written a lot, so still have some impression.- I basically is to enlarge the logic of "representatives" constantly, I review, I was wrong, my mistake if you are outside class the classmate see, they say the students of class so-and-so how so bad, I this is a disgrace to their class and grade body;If finally by a classmate see, they will think that a school's students is very poor, I this is a disgrace to their school;See if you are a foreigner, they will think that the Chinese are very poor, I this is a disgrace to China;If seen by aliens, they will think the earth is very poor, I this is to discredit the earth;If the aliens so look down on the earth, provoked, Star Wars led to the destruction of the Milky Way...This, all because I didn't hand in your homework in the morning today!

Ha ha, so I think Guo Lao write poem mentality and I write check is the same.

Why do I have to come out to Guo Lao say a few words to be fair, as I mentioned previously that "based on" is mainly Guo Lao research.Now Guo Lao reputation is too smelly, I lead a his point of view, fear many people will soon give birth to resistance.Although zhouyi Guo Lao study some conclusions of basic overturned now, but I can't overthrown in the content, there are some very strong opinions.

Rub metasomatism, then speak with respect to this below: are the zhouyi really the idea of possession against dictatorship?The men of the year how can have such avant-garde ideas?Dictatorship has been a history of traditional Chinese?

- this will need to check the origin of the zhouyi.